Broscar wrote:PS: Crysis 1 still dips down to 32 fps all the time. Heavily CPU limited, but jeez, I doubt even an overclocked Skylake could run it well.
Broscar wrote:Ryu, you need to fire Crysis up again if you think it's not CPU limited. The game's engine is a mess and some areas wreak absolute havoc on anything which isn't on this list. That, plus destroying a few huts will drop your fps hard, no matter the area. The price of great physics
You can run the game on the updated Warhead engine, but that's like putting a band-aid on a gaping hole. Still worth doing though.
Man, the 2500K was sick.
Can even run it passively at 4.9GHz, which is just... disgusting to say the least.
Broscar wrote:I don't know what PyreX is. If you mean PhysX; Crysis doesn't use PhysX, so adding another GPU to my system would literally have zero impact on the game (also: the 1070 is more than powerful enough to run anything PhysX related by itself, even on top of rendering jobs).
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests