Why 'or'? Let's have Damage AND No Damage Modes!

Here you give us specific suggestions on how you think the private release can be improved.

This isn't for bug reports, this is for features (example: wrong way indicator)
User avatar
ristridi
Early Supporter 3
Early Supporter 3
Posts: 23
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2015 4:58 am
Location: Bavaria, Germany
Contact:

Why 'or'? Let's have Damage AND No Damage Modes!

Postby ristridi » Fri Feb 05, 2016 3:48 pm

@Mods: If a new topic for this isn't necessary in your eyes, please feel free move this to the other already existing thread ;)

So, a while ago, there was a discussion about whether we wanna have destructible cars while racing or not.
Why not make both options available? I know you have your hands full with getting everything else done, but I think that could be a nice little addition after everything else is done.
Whats your opinion on this?

Thanks already for your efforts!

Greetings, MIchael.

User avatar
Chris_CE
Grip Developer
Grip Developer
Posts: 2175
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2015 4:44 pm
Contact:

Re: Why 'or'? Let's have Damage AND No Damage Modes!

Postby Chris_CE » Fri Feb 05, 2016 4:03 pm

I would love to see cars explode in races. The option just hasn't been added to the menu yet
Game Director
GRIP

WROB3L
Early Supporter 6
Early Supporter 6
Posts: 512
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 12:18 am
Location: Poland

Re: Why 'or'? Let's have Damage AND No Damage Modes!

Postby WROB3L » Fri Feb 05, 2016 8:10 pm

Chris_CE wrote:I would love to see cars explode in races. The option just hasn't been added to the menu yet


About explosions, When car explode in the race it would be more realistic if it`s parts would be scattered around so start working on it chris :D
FOR THE RAZIELIM!

And with a pot of F*ckedUppery
Powerful Cthulhu created me :twisted:

One of the first players in Image 3rd or 4th. I dont remember xD

User avatar
potterman28wxcv
Early Supporter 6
Early Supporter 6
Posts: 1285
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2015 12:20 pm
Location: Grenoble - France
Contact:

Re: Why 'or'? Let's have Damage AND No Damage Modes!

Postby potterman28wxcv » Sat Feb 06, 2016 7:18 am

After playing Blur, I support this idea.

To the player, it has a lot of satisfaction to blow up someone.
For the someone being blown up, he can just respawn after 2-3 seconds of penality.

I don't think it would break up that much the flow of the race.
Only add some thrilling moments, and some "Oooh damn !" when you're wrecked.

With an option, people would be able to experiment with it, and then see which one they prefer.
Because I'm even more boring than Broscar -> Rules of the GRIP forum
Check out the sign-ups for the Rollcage Neo-mode Tournament 2017, starting 15th April !

And with a rusty wrench
God created the french

Admin of the Image

WROB3L
Early Supporter 6
Early Supporter 6
Posts: 512
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 12:18 am
Location: Poland

Re: Why 'or'? Let's have Damage AND No Damage Modes!

Postby WROB3L » Sat Feb 06, 2016 8:15 pm

potterman28wxcv wrote:After playing Blur, I support this idea.

To the player, it has a lot of satisfaction to blow up someone.
For the someone being blown up, he can just respawn after 2-3 seconds of penality.

I don't think it would break up that much the flow of the race.
Only add some thrilling moments, and some "Oooh damn !" when you're wrecked.

With an option, people would be able to experiment with it, and then see which one they prefer.


It could work like in wipeout HD, when you`re low on health you could just absorb the powerup to repair yourself.
FOR THE RAZIELIM!

And with a pot of F*ckedUppery
Powerful Cthulhu created me :twisted:

One of the first players in Image 3rd or 4th. I dont remember xD

User avatar
Clone303
Posts: 16
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2016 9:37 pm
Location: right here

Re: [LISTED] Why 'or'? Let's have Damage AND No Damage Modes!

Postby Clone303 » Sun Feb 07, 2016 2:41 am

i like the old Rollcage so no damage, normal i would like damage but i want it to follow in footstep of Rollcage
Long life Rollcage again!

Similii
Early Supporter 4
Early Supporter 4
Posts: 155
Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2015 10:57 am

Re: [LISTED] Why 'or'? Let's have Damage AND No Damage Modes!

Postby Similii » Sun Feb 07, 2016 5:48 am

Clone303 wrote:i like the old Rollcage so no damage, normal i would like damage but i want it to follow in footstep of Rollcage

Except that the game is only inspired of Rollcage and not a sequel to Rollcage (Sony would send some lawyers to Caged in that case...) ;) . So they can make what they want all around the concept of furious racing :)

And I want cars to explode! Let me nuclearize some bots on Yuri Industrial!!!
If you want to be grammar nazi to me, just do it, that will improve my english :3

WROB3L
Early Supporter 6
Early Supporter 6
Posts: 512
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 12:18 am
Location: Poland

Re: [LISTED] Why 'or'? Let's have Damage AND No Damage Modes!

Postby WROB3L » Sun Feb 07, 2016 7:34 am

Similii wrote:Sony would send some lawyers to Caged in that case... ;)


I dont think so, sony said that Playstation was home of Rollcage so Grip is too, i`m not sure if they would really send lawyers to caged element.
And let`s remember that sony isn`t Micro$hit they are trying to help developers not f*ck them up.
FOR THE RAZIELIM!

And with a pot of F*ckedUppery
Powerful Cthulhu created me :twisted:

One of the first players in Image 3rd or 4th. I dont remember xD

MTR
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2016 8:36 pm

Re: [LISTED] Why 'or'? Let's have Damage AND No Damage Modes!

Postby MTR » Tue Mar 01, 2016 4:25 pm

Sry for resurrecting a dead thread...
@Wrob3l - I've seen it too well in PS3 Era ;) HW was quirky but nice as long as you knew how to handle it, but dev support... NC. Let's just say that in most of the cases the support was much, much better on M$ side - really ;)

Also I don't think that MS hate is justified here. Like it or not, but designing/writing an OS with this kind of compatibility and backward compatibility req's is a rather huge and complex task. So far they manage to get it done quite okay (technically, aside from design choices)

Lets get back to the subject however :)
As for the damages... I think that it would be cool to blow somebody up once in a while. The respawn is another question. Personally I think it is unnecessary, and all of the destroyed cars should remain out of the race, no matter if AI or player controlled. On the other hand, the player should be given the option to absorb the pickups to regain part of the energy (repair the car?)
That's just my opinion :)

Regards!, Pozdrawiam!
Michał

omegalucas
Posts: 13
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2016 7:35 am

Re: [LISTED] Why 'or'? Let's have Damage AND No Damage Modes!

Postby omegalucas » Mon Mar 21, 2016 5:53 am

I have to say I love the destructible cars option.
I do feel like there should be a respawn option available as well, thus pleasing all the sides.

User avatar
Chris_CE
Grip Developer
Grip Developer
Posts: 2175
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2015 4:44 pm
Contact:

Re: [LISTED] Why 'or'? Let's have Damage AND No Damage Modes!

Postby Chris_CE » Tue Mar 22, 2016 5:23 pm

I love the destructible cars in races option as well. I always have it enabled.

Agreed about the respawning. Something we need to implement in Arena as well, not just last car standing. The respawning needs to be done well, though. Like an animation of the car parts getting slammed back together or something
Game Director
GRIP


Return to “Suggestions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron